Clinical and optic disc characteristics of patients showing visual recovery in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Moon Y, Kim US, Han J, Ahn H, Lim HT. J Neuroophthalmol 2020; 40:15-21. Abstract BACKGROUND: The visual prognosis in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is generally poor. However, some individuals can have spontaneous visual recovery (VR) in one or […]
Safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet pretreatment in patients with ischemic stroke treated with IV thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Malhotra K, Katsanos AH, Goyal N, et al. Neurology 2020; 94:e657-e666. Abstract OBJECTIVE: Conflicting data exist on the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) receiving dual […]
This is Peter Mellett Pete lives in Wadebridge, a picturesque town tucked nicely in the Cornish countryside. *** Pete loves going on cycling trips. But above every thing else, he loves reading his two adorable children to sleep. *** But for us at Neurochecklists… Pete is a genius at web development. He has taken the […]
I am yet to request serum neurofilament light protein (NfL) in my practice. I am not sure yet why I should, but until now I confess I really haven’t looked for a reason to do so. I however know that some MSologists now tick it, along with other blood tests, when they investigate people they suspect may have multiple sclerosis (MS). NfL are proteins that are released by damaged neurones. Should I be requesting NfL in my clinical practice? I sniffed around to find the case for testing serum NfL, and below is what I found.
Many studies have looked at the value of NfL in MS. One such very well-planned study that addresses many of my questions is that by Guili Disanto and colleagues, published in the journal Annals of Neurology in 2017. In the paper, titled Serum Neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis, the authors studied >380 people with MS and >150 healthy controls, and report four important findings.
- The levels of NfL in serum strongly correlate with the levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of people with MS.
- People with more active and more severe MS had higher levels of NfL.
- People with MS on disease modifying treatment (DMT) had lower NfL levels than those who were not on treatment.
- In people with MS who had their serum NfL tested serially over time, the level of NfL predicted those who will develop frequent relapses or progressive MS.
The authors concluded, with enough justification I think, that serum NfL is a “sensitive and clinically meaningful blood biomarker to monitor tissue damage and the effects of therapies in MS“.
The strong correlation between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum NfL was also confirmed by a study published in the journal Neurology, by Lenka Novakova and colleagues titled Monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis using serum neurofilament light protein. As the title indicates, they discovered that serum NfL is as good as CSF NfL in monitoring the progression of MS.
The observation that NfL predicts the course of MS is supported by many other studies, such as the one by Kristin Varhaug and colleagues in the journal Neurology Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation whose title is also self-explanatory: Neurofilament light chain predicts disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS. A more recent paper, also published in Neurology, further reinforces the benefit of serum NfL in disease course prediction. It is titled Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of MS disease activity and treatment response. In this paper, Jehns Kuhle and colleagues practically confirm all the above stated benefits of NfL, concluding that “our results support the utility of blood NfL as an easily accessible biomarker of disease evolution and treatment response”.
As for long term outcome, the 10 year follow up study by Alok Bahn and colleagues, published in the Multiple Sclerosis Journal in 2018, is most informative. In their paper titled Neurofilaments and 10-year follow-up in multiple sclerosis, the authors noted that “CSF levels of NfL at the time of diagnosis seems to be an early predictive biomarker of long-term clinical outcome and conversion from RRMS to SPMS”. Further support for the long term prognostic value of serum NfL comes from a paper published in 2018 in the journal Brain titled Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. The authors, Christian Barro and colleagues, studied more than 250 people with MS and concluded that “the higher the serum neurofilament light chain percentile level, the more pronounced was future brain and cervical spinal volume loss“.
It is pertinent to note that the MS sphere is not the only one in which NfL is making waves. It has been found to be elevated in many other disorders such as motor neurone disease (MND), multiple system atrophy (MSA), hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), stroke, active small vessel disease, and peripheral neuropathy (PN). With these disclaimers in place, it may just be time to start ticking that NfL box.
Concussion in adolescence and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study. Povolo CA, Reid JN, Shariff SZ, Welk B, Morrow SA. Mult Scler 2020 (Epub ahead of print). Abstract BACKGROUND: Physical trauma, specifically concussions sustained during adolescence, has been hypothesized to be a risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between adolescent concussions and future MS diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective study using […]
This is just a short blog post to let you know that… As promised, we have updated and revised our: Coronavirus COVID-19 Checklists As always, They remain concise and practical And of course fully referenced And as new data emerges We shall continue to update our checklists
Acute ischemic myelopathy treated with intravenous thrombolysis: four new cases and literature review. Jankovic J, Rey Bataillard V, Mercier N, Bonvin C, Michel P. Int J Stroke 2019; 14:893-897. Abstract BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis is a well-established treatment of ischemic stroke within 4.5 h. However, its effectiveness in acute ischemic myelopathy is unknown. PURPOSE: We describe a […]