Vascular risk factors in INPH: a prospective case-control study (the INPH-CRasH study) Israelsson H, Carlberg B, Wikkelsö C, et al Neurology 2017; 88:577-585 Abstract OBJECTIVE: To assess the complete vascular risk factor (VRF) profile of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) using a large sample of representative patients with INPH and population-based controls to determine the […]
Jean-Marie Charcot, Pierre Marie, and Howard Henry Tooth will be confounded to see what has become of the disease they described hundreds of years ago. Charcot-Marie Tooth disease (CMT) was a simple and straightforward disease then, with easily recognisable features such as the ‘classic’ high arched foot (pes cavus), the hammer toes, and the inverted champagne glass appearance of […]
Primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) is inflammation of the blood vessels of the central nervous system (stating the obvious you might say). It differs from other forms of angiitis or vasculitis, such as lupus and giant cell arteritis (GCA), which respect no boundaries. PACNS is as dangerous a neurological disorder as they come, and just as rare. It requires aggressive, and paradoxically equally life-threatening, immunosuppressive treatment. Between the devil and deep blue sea-that’s exactly where the neurologist managing a patient with PACNS will be found.
The clinical features of PACNS are unfortunately very non-specific and include headaches, seizures, stroke, and cognitive changes. This makes PACNS is a challenge to diagnose. Even when suspected, PACNS may evade detection even by the special scan of the blood vessels called angiography. More frequently, the only certain way of confirming this disease in life is with a brain biopsy. Did I say ‘certain’? I take that back. Alas, even brain biopsy is not guaranteed to make the diagnosis of PACNS. A high degree of confidence and teeth-gritting is therefore an absolute requirement in any neurologist unfortunate enough to come face-to-face with this menace.
To make complicated matters even worse for the unwary neurologist, there are now reports suggesting that PACNS presents in even rarer and atypical ways. For the neurological Sherlocks and Poirots, here are 2 unusual presentations of PACNS.
Isolated spinal cord involvement
This is a case report from the Journal of Neurology of a 44-year old woman who presented with PACNS but with purely spinal cord involvement and completely sparing the brain. The diagnosis in this case was only confirmed with a spinal cord biopsy. The authors reviewed the literature and only found 8 previous reports of PACNS beginning in the spinal cord, and half of these progressed to involve the brain.
Unilateral cerebral presentation
Most cases of PACNS evenly involve both sides of the brain. This report, again from Journal of Neurology, bucks this trend with the report of a 55-year old man who had PACNS which only involved the left side of his brain. This unilateral hemispheric PACNS is a reminder that an entity called focal PACNS exists.
Do you have any sightings of unusual cases of PACNS? Please drop a comment
Neurology is full of syndromes named after their discoverers. These diseases are defined by their eponyms. Many of these eponymous disorders are very common and well-recognised. These include Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and Huntington’s disease (HD). Many other diseases, also named after people who worked on them, are not household names. Indeed many neurologists are […]
The Neurology Lounge is always on the lookout for catchy neurology article titles to adorn its shelves. My previous blog post in this quest was The art of spinning catchy titles.
Since then, there have been quite a few brilliant article titles that have caught my fancy. We must acknowledge the wordsmiths who craftily and meticulously think up these magical headlines; they put in a lot of thought to conjure up the right words to use. The look into their crystal balls to predict the best way to play around with the meanings. With a bit of lexical alchemy, they miraculously come up with the titles that make us do a double-take, but do so with a smile. Below are 9 such catchy titles.
This title reflects the science suggesting that Parkinson’s disease originates from the gut. This editorial restates the proposition that α-synuclein starts accumulating in the intestines before migrating, up the vagus nerve, ‘in a prion-like fashion’, to the brain.
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a hole in the heart which connects the upper two heart chambers, or atria. It normally closes after birth, but in some people it persists to cause some grief to cardiologists and neurologists. Whether a PFO causes migraine or not is a long standing contentious issue in Neurology. The authors of this study found no link between migraine and (PFO). The title is brilliant, but the tone of finality is probably premature; I guess this debate is far from over.
And still on migraine is this headline grabber. A bit on the basic science spectrum, I quote from the abstract to give you a flavour: ‘This review focuses on recent structural and functional neuroimaging studies that investigated the role of subcortical and cortical structures in modulating nociceptive input in migraine, which outlined the presence of an imbalance between inhibitory and excitatory modulation of pain processing in the disease‘. I would rather stick with the punchy headline myself.
This research paper establishes a link between transient epileptic amnesia (TEA) and impairment of the sense of smell. TEA continues to surprise, and there is indeed quite a lot to chew in the paper.
This is a clear play on the defining feature of neuromyelitis optica (NMO), a long segment of inflammation in the spinal cord. This is what neurologists call longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM). This is an excellent editorial, worthy of the headline. It emphasises the point that NMO really has no defining features, not even the presence of the ‘defining’ antibody, anti-aquaporin 4- just ask anti-MOG NMO about this
How do you prevent a harmful preventative practice?. By a paper with a title that is pure genius of course. The authors of this paper highlight the persisting, anti-guideline, practice of using prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in people who have had intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). The paper rhetorically asks if this has ‘become a habit too difficult to break?’ Not going by this catchy headline!
Parasomnias are diseases that occur during or related to sleep. This headline is for an editorial on a new parasomnia called anti IgLON5 antibody disorder. This is the subject of my previous blog post titled IgLON5: a new antibody disorder for neurologists. The headline writer here is clearly a fan of John Milton. I however struggled to make the connection between the excellent headline and the subject of the paper. I however presume it relates to the ‘loss of sleep paralysis‘ that accompanies many sleep disorders, including the quintessential parasomnia- REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD). Excellent title anyway.
With a slightly wicked wit, this headline focuses on the slow walking speed of people with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), contrasting this with the increasing research output on the disease. A bit dated I admit, but the paper refers to work which identified the genetic basis of SPG3, one of the commoner HSPs. A lesson in headline writing from the archives you may say.
The headline is brilliant, but the content goes way over my head. It is an editorial on a basic science paper. For the curious and the nerdy, I quote an extract: ‘during synapse elimination in the developing neuromuscular junction, branch-specific microtubule destabilization results in arrested axonal transport and induces axon branch loss. This process is mediated in part by the neurodegeneration-associated, microtubule-severing protein spastin‘. Enough I hear you say. OK, just stick with the headline.
Do you have any catchy titles-please drop a comment.